Here's an updated spreadsheet, which roughly compares the points costs between X-wing 2.0 and X-wing 2.5.
I've reverse engineered X-wing 2.5 pilots back into a 2.0 point value, which gives a rough idea of what pilots are 'good value' in each cost slot. My assumption is that the points values FFG had at the end of 2.0 were approximately balanced (Debatable, but I think they were close). More ships and pilots have come out since I first published the sheet, so I have done my best to estimate their old 2.0 cost using similar pilots. Ditto for the standardised builds. My estimates are all clearly highlighted, so take them with a grain of salt.
The differences in value obviously doesn't tell the whole story, but it's been useful enough in my list building, in conjunction with YASB 2.5.
I've also created a second sheet which ranks the pilots by how much of a points difference their is between their 2.0 cost, and their 2.5 cost. Ships that are higher in the rank are better 'value', and hence are probably pretty strong ships (again all the caveats of it an estimate). Like the previous sheets, anything highlighted in yellow is a ship it's had to have a rough guess at it's 2.0 cost by using other similar ships and/or pilots.
Hope you find this all helpful!
No comments:
Post a Comment